Apart from the sixteen major storms that have hit Vancouver the past two months, ripping old growth timber from its roots, there has been a similar tempest blowing at the Marine Drive Golf Club. Thirty-six female members have failed for the second time to gain equal status to the club’s men-only Bullpen lounge.
The recent ruling by the B.C. Court of Appeals, and before that the B.C. Supreme Court, found the club’s facilities are not public on any reasonable interpretation and therefore it has not violated any discrimination codes against women. While women are permitted access to the club’s newly redecorated mixed lounge with a better view, they cannot enter the one preserve left for men only.
Rose-Mary Basham, the Vancouver lawyer handling the appeal for the complainants, plans to take the issue to the Supreme Court of Canada. Brian Butters, president of the club, says the issue is finished after two court rulings on the club’s behalf.
On the surface this appears to be a petty squabble, rooted in a lifestyle where members gather socially behind the stately gates of privilege and what happens in the clubhouse stays in the clubhouse.
Basham thinks otherwise. She is a golfer at the sister Point Grey Golf Club, where she broke a 75-year tradition in 1994 by becoming a one of the club’s first fully paying female members when she challenged the Point Grey club’s by-laws so she could play on Saturdays. She learned in her research that the club’s founders had already provided the rights to full-play membership for women but that no other female up to that point had taken advantage of the opportunity.
Basham is self-described five-eighths Chinese, with a mix of Filipino and Irish. She says she is not a crusading feminist. “I got involved because if the (Marine Drive) club can discriminate over gender they will have an unfettered right to discriminate against any member on the basis of race, age, and religion.”
Butters says there is no discrimination. Over the past two years he has led a renovation effort at the club to increase the size and service in the women’s lounge along with providing a better west-facing view of the 18th hole. “The men gave up much of their view.”
Butters, elected by the membership to serve a third term as president, says the issue was little more than “room envy.”
Butters claims the complaints come from 15% of the total female membership of approximately 225 women. Further, he has full support from other women members who have on “multiple occasions overwhelmingly supported gender-specific lounges.”
This begs the question: Why would women who are offended by club policy and who complain of harassment continue to support an organization that prides itself on its male-only policy?
“I really don’t know,” Butters responds. “Some have left the club. If anyone else is unhappy I wish they would leave too.”
Basham is still on the fight card and has started the next appeal. “Allowing discrimination of any kind sends a message that it’s okay to segregate,” Basham says. “This is not just about men and women in a private social club. This is about law.”
Butters chaffs at her accusations. “No amount of fear-mongering or alarmist rhetoric by the complainants or their legal counsel is likely to change that point of view.”
There is an apocryphal story from Scotland that says golf was originally an acronym for “gentlemen only, ladies forbidden”. In southwest Vancouver golf lives on in the Bullpen.